Home Tax TaxProf Weblog

TaxProf Weblog

TaxProf Weblog


Wednesday, January 11, 2023

Toronto Workshop In the present day On The Tax Coverage Implications Of Collins Household Belief

Jeffrey Trossman (Blakes), Amanda Heale (Osler), Michael Lubetsky (Davies), Timothy Fitzsimmons (PwC) current Views On Tax Legislation & Coverage: The Collins Household Belief at Toronto in the present day as a part of the James Hausman Tax Legislation and Coverage Workshop:

Trossman heale fitzsimmons and lubetskyThis concern of Views is dedicated to a dialogue of the coverage implications of the latest SCC determination in Legal professional Common of Canada v. Collins Household Belief (2022 SCC 26).

Collins concerned two taxpayers who every carried out a plan in 2008 and 2009 that aimed to guard company belongings from future collectors with out creating any revenue tax legal responsibility. The plan was based mostly on the CRA’s longstanding and broadly accepted administrative coverage on the attribution rule in subsection 75(2) of the ITA. This coverage was undermined in 2011 when the TCC determined Sommerer (2011 TCC 212; aff’d 2012 FCA 207) on a foundation opposite to the longstanding coverage. The CRA then proposed to reassess the taxpayers in Collins on the premise of the brand new interpretation, even whereas concurrently arguing on the FCA that the brand new interpretation was incorrect. The FCA confirmed the TCC determination, nonetheless, and the CRA reassessed the taxpayers’ 2008 and 2009 taxation years in accordance with the brand new interpretation of subsection 75(2).

The taxpayers petitioned the BC Supreme Court docket for orders rescinding the transactions concerned within the plan, beneath the doctrine of equitable rescission. The orders have been granted and subsequently upheld by the BC Court docket of Attraction. By an 8-1 majority, nonetheless, the SCC reversed the BC Court docket of Attraction and put aside the orders. 

In so doing, the SCC considerably narrowed the scope of the rescission doctrine. Making an allowance for the SCC’s 2016 selections on the equitable doctrine of rectification (Fairmont Lodges, 2016 SCC 56, and the accompanying civil-law case of Jean Coutu Group, 2016 SCC 55), the courtroom has now largely foreclosed using these treatments for unexpected tax obligations. This raises a severe coverage query as as to if and the way the regulation ought to relieve wholly harmless errors that come up in the midst of tax planning or implementation.

This introductory article canvasses the choices recognized in Collins as options to equitable treatments for errors in tax planning, and it discusses some potential reforms. Different articles on this concern assessment particular implications of Collins, together with (1) the bulk’s troubling obiter dicta in regards to the minister of nationwide income’s supposed lack of discretion in administering the ITA and in resolving tax disputes, (2) the state of affairs in Quebec following Collins, and (3) the continued availability of different treatments to handle sure company errors beneath BC regulation.


Colloquia, Scholarship, Tax, Tax Scholarship, Tax Workshops | Permalink



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here