
[ad_1]
This journey began again in October 2022. After three years of no touring and 4 years not having been to the US, it was lastly potential to have an in-person occasion once more, or at the least partially.
StockCharts.com has been internet hosting its bi-annual convention, “ChartCon,” since ####. My first attendance was in 2014, shortly after Relative Rotation Graphs had been launched on the positioning. At the moment, it was nonetheless an all-in-person occasion.
In 2016 ChartCon switched to a hybrid format the place attendees had been capable of attend on-line with a small group on-site the place all presenters would even be to ship their talks. As a result of Corona Pandemic, it was not potential to have a convention in 2020, however as quickly as issues settled down and the world opened up once more, the group at StockCharts started working and put collectively ChartCon 2022.
Among the many elite group of audio system was Ralph Acampora, the Godfather of Technical Evaluation, who wants no additional introduction for these of you who have not seen the documentary about Ralph’s barn. Please do your self a favor and watch it right here on StockCharts Tv.
After two intensive days of placing collectively an amazing convention, all of us acquired collectively for drinks and a little bit of dinner, and naturally, a chat.
I ended up in a setting with Ralph Acampora, his nephew Jay Woods (pictured above), and some others when an interesting dialog emerged.
It’s important to know that Ralph and I am going again greater than 30 years now. The primary time I met him was in 1992 on the IFTA convention in Dublin, Eire. Ever since, it is “Hey, massive man, how are you doing?” each time we meet.
The dialogue revolved round previous vs. new and the way computer systems had taken over buying and selling and order execution. Jay was chipping in from his expertise as an NYSE flooring governor, and I got here in from my expertise with institutional buyers as I used to be engaged on buying and selling flooring of funding banks. It was a little bit of choosing and making enjoyable of “the previous man” in a pleasant setting.
Because the chat continued, the talk turned to “outperformance” and the way institutional buyers these days are dominated by benchmarks. They should beat them, however they aren’t allowed to diverge an excessive amount of as a result of meaning an excessive amount of danger within the portfolio, and that is not allowed by the rules of the mandate, and many others., and many others.
Then Ralph started telling a narrative about his expertise within the time he was working with Prudential Securities.
Ralph talks
At PruSec, I not solely needed to cope with institutional purchasers but additionally to drop into the agency’s native retail investor’s workplaces. In different phrases, I used to be all the time interacting with purchasers that had fully completely different funding goals. For me, personally and professionally, this was not solely difficult however was a really rewarding expertise.
Someday in 1995, throughout a retail workplace go to, I introduced the viewers with my evaluation of these sectors and shares that had been outperforming the inventory market (S&P 500). And it was throughout dinner that two buyers got here as much as me looking for a extra detailed clarification of precisely what I meant by “efficiency”. I then took out my pad and defined in additional element precisely what comparative relative power is and the way it’s calculated.
I took the present worth of Normal Motors and divided it by the present worth of the S&P 500, which was the ratio. I said that skilled portfolio managers needed to “beat the market.” In different phrases, the best development of this ratio, which I sketched on the pad, needs to be transferring up on a chart, indicating that your particular person inventory/sector was outperforming the market; a impartial development on this ratio meant that the sector or inventory was “even with the market.” And lastly, a downward development on this ratio meant that your inventory/sector was “underperforming the market.”
One in all these two buyers then stated: “Wait a minute, if my inventory is up 25% and the S&P 500 is up 30%, you’d then say that that is unhealthy information as a result of I’m not beating the market? Who cares what the S&P 500 is doing? I’m making a revenue. And that is what is most necessary to me as a person investor.”
And the second investor chimed in, saying: “I’ve one other instance that does not sound fairly proper to me. To illustrate my inventory is down 25% and the S&P 500 is down 30 %; you’d then inform me that that is excellent news as a result of I’m outperforming the inventory market. Are you loopy? I’m dropping a ton of cash – who cares what the S&P 500 is doing?
Actually, I by no means checked out comparative relative power by the eyes of a person investor earlier than. Now I had an issue, which set of glasses would I take advantage of when taking a look at comparative relative power – it’s fairly apparent that institutional buyers have to beat the market as a way to keep in enterprise, whereas particular person buyers search solely to make a revenue.
After I returned to my workplace in New York Metropolis, I couldn’t get this battle out of my thoughts. So, I began scribbling strains on paper as a way to make sense of the true which means of efficiency. It took time, however finally, I spotted that there are literally 9 variations of worth developments versus comparative relative power developments. And that is what I got here up with.
Explaining One thing With out Pen and Paper
Then Ralph began drawing within the air, explaining how he seen relative efficiency towards worth efficiency. Basically exhibiting the grid as we all know it from the sport noughts and crosses.
Through the years, I shared these 9 mixtures with my college students and a few of my institutional buyers however by no means wrote about it in any of my formal technical studies.
Later I began to do a weekly evaluation of those 9 mixtures for all thirty Dow Jones Industrial Common shares. Once more, I did not publish these outcomes, however they had been very fascinating, particularly at turning factors within the general inventory market.
Relative Power, Grids, and Visualization
Ralph advised us that he had shared his outcomes with a few of his colleagues within the trade, however none appeared too .
Are you able to consider it? Relative, power, grids, and visualization. Clearly, that acquired me .
After Ralph completed his clarification, Jay and I began speaking about how that strategy could possibly be “computerized” and made extra “quantitative.” After all, we additionally made the odd joke that having a pc do all of the work would enable Ralph to get pleasure from his Merlot on Sunday night.
We additionally wanted to get an excellent title for this “factor”; Ralph’s 9, The 9 of Acampora, Acampora’s 9, Ralph’s 9 Grid or R9G, and plenty of extra had been thrown up within the air, however none actually saved floating.
Because the dialogue and the night drew to an finish, I promised Ralph to jot down one thing about it (this text) and see if I may prototype the 9-grid so we may do extra analysis.
After I returned to my farm close to Amsterdam and Ralph to his in Minnesota, I began brainstorming this, and emails began flying. Since October 19 (good date 😉 ), about 25 Emails have been despatched, and two video calls have been held.
Eye Balling vs. Bits&Bytes
One of many first issues we bumped into was the truth that Ralph is/was eye-balling these developments quite than utilizing some hard-coded components to find out the development. Clearly, the pc wants a number of guidelines to find out when a development is transferring up, down, or sideways.
In trendy technical evaluation, there are a lot of methods to perform such an evaluation. To maintain issues easy, we opted to make use of the basic dual-moving common strategy. A brief and a protracted MA, and we require the Brief MA AND the Near be above the Lengthy Ma for an Uptrend. A downtrend requires the brief MA AND the near be beneath the lengthy MA. Every other mixture is labeled as sideways.
Thus far, so good.
However once I began to crank out some outcomes and we began evaluating notes. My “computerized” outcomes had been nowhere close to his grasp’s visible observations. And though I used to be anticipating some discrepancies, this was means off.
It wasn’t till I began quizzing Ralph on how he was labeling the buckets on the grid that I spotted he began counting within the top-left nook of the grid after which going row by row. This meant that the X-axis, which holds the value development, was flipped the other way up… So I needed to be the bearer of unhealthy information and convey the message:
Ralph, computer systems do not like that 😉
As soon as I stylized the grid going from down, to sideways, to up on each scales, issues began to make extra sense.
A Sticky title
In the meantime, the brainstorming on an excellent title continued. After realizing that Ralph is far more good-looking than George and undoubtedly means smarter, we determined to ditch the film associations, and finally, we got here up with the next acronym:
“Acampora’s Relative Grid of Nine – ARGoN“
The following drawback I confronted was the truth that the StockCharts system doesn’t enable (but, we’re engaged on it), the extent of customized coding that’s wanted to realize the required outcomes. So, I coded up this strategy within the software program of our pals down underneath at Optuma.com and used the scatter-plot visualization to create the nine-grid. With a little bit of tweaking, I managed to get the ticker symbols plotted within the varied buckets (there is a restrict to what number of symbols can present up in the identical bucket, however for now, it is sufficient to indicate the thought).
In a reside implementation, it’s even potential to make the symbols transfer by the buckets over time and see how they transfer as a bunch.
Issues may have ended right here, as this in itself is a quite simple however very efficient show of relative vs. worth developments. And as Ralph does this just for the DJ Industrial shares, he can do it inside two glasses of his beloved Merlot each Sunday night time.
Larger Index = Extra Tough
Once you would attempt to do that for bigger indexes just like the S&P 500, this is able to be way more tough, if not unimaginable. Ralph would want at the least two bottles of Merlot each weekend, which may trigger undesirable uncomfortable side effects…
So right here comes the pc and a few assist from Mathew Verdouw at Optuma.com, who kindly has arrange a web page on https://app.optuma.com/argon the place you’ll be able to see ARGON for a number of bigger universes just like the S&P 500, Nasdaq 100, and FTSE 100, ASX 200.
We would like to emphasise that that is very a lot a showcase setup to get the thought behind ARGoN and is nowhere close to a completed product. Folks might wish to experiment with their very own development measures, their very own funding horizons, and many others.
A Use Case For Market Breadth
Lastly, Ralph advised us that he acquired an amazing sense of market breadth by trying on the distribution of the symbols on the grid. His tough estimate was that when greater than 50% of the shares, rely > 15 within the case of DJI, are within the higher echelon of the market, on this case, the DJ Industrials, is in an uptrend.
Clearly, all of it relies on the funding horizon and the definition of a development that’s used. All people can tailor that to their very own liking. Long run, shorter time period, completely different metrics for development measurement, and many others., and many others.
When making a “breadth indicator,” you want the historic knowledge for all of the rankings, and also you want to have the ability to rely/summarize/and many others. these values over time. Optuma’s customized breadth builder lets you do this.
The charts beneath present a number of variations of ARGON breadth.
1. Day by day worth chart with ARGON breadth on day by day knowledge
2. Weekly worth chart with ARGON breadth on weekly knowledge
3. Day by day worth chart with ARGON breadth on weekly knowledge.
With this, Ralph’s brainchild ARGoN is now reside and shared with the trade wherein he has been instrumental for a lot of analysts.
There may be way more analysis that may be carried out to fine-tune the parameters and discover use circumstances. You’re inspired to take this strategy and tailor it to your individual wants and concepts. The one factor we ask is to respect Ralph’s concept and preserve the acronym ARGoN as a reference to his work.
Julius de Kempenaer & Ralph Acampora
Julius de Kempenaer
Senior Technical Analyst, StockCharts.com
Creator, Relative Rotation Graphs
Founder, RRG Analysis
Host of: Sector Highlight
Please discover my handles for social media channels underneath the Bio beneath.
Suggestions, feedback or questions are welcome at Juliusdk@stockcharts.com. I can not promise to reply to each message, however I’ll actually learn them and, the place moderately potential, use the suggestions and feedback or reply questions.
To debate RRG with me on S.C.A.N., tag me utilizing the deal with Julius_RRG.
RRG, Relative Rotation Graphs, JdK RS-Ratio, and JdK RS-Momentum are registered logos of RRG Analysis.

Julius de Kempenaer is the creator of Relative Rotation Graphs™. This distinctive methodology to visualise relative power inside a universe of securities was first launched on Bloomberg skilled companies terminals in January of 2011 and was launched on StockCharts.com in July of 2014.
After graduating from the Dutch Royal Army Academy, Julius served within the Dutch Air Drive in a number of officer ranks. He retired from the navy as a captain in 1990 to enter the monetary trade as a portfolio supervisor for Fairness & Regulation (now a part of AXA Funding Managers).
Be taught Extra
Subscribe to RRG Charts to be notified each time a brand new put up is added to this weblog!
[ad_2]