The Securities and Change Fee (SEC) has confirmed that Tesla CEO Elon Musk remains to be required to have legal professionals pre-approve any tweets associated to the automaker. This comes after the SEC investigated Musk in 2018 over tweeting that he had “funding secured” to take Tesla personal for $420 per share — inflicting fluctuations in Tesla’s share worth. The EV maker and Musk settled individually with the SEC for $20 million however admitted no wrongdoing.

Regardless of this, TechCrunch studies that Musk‘s legal professionals lately tried to finish what they known as a “government-imposed muzzle” on his speech, stating {that a} latest jury verdict supported the attraction.

In that case, jurors discovered that Musk’s tweets didn’t violate Rule 10b-5 — enacted in 2000 to make clear the definition of insider buying and selling — and the SEC’s arguments on attraction lacked assist. Nevertheless, the SEC took challenge with Musk lawyer Alex Spiro’s argument that profitable the case supplied related authority, arguing as a substitute {that a} jury verdict in a personal securities-fraud motion just isn’t relevant. In the event that they discover new authorized aut hority instantly associated to the difficulty raised on attraction, legal professionals can submit that as a part of supporting an appellate court docket.

The SEC’s continued battle with Musk might increase questions over defending free speech in company governance. Nonetheless, the SEC argues that shareholders want legal professionals to pre-approve any tweets associated to Tesla as a result of they want correct data relating to their investments. The company believes pre-approval of Musk’s tweets may guarantee the proper data is disclosed.