With regards to JPMorgan Chase’s practically 15-year enterprise relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, Jamie Dimon, the financial institution’s longtime chief government, claims to have little firsthand information concerning the disgraced financier.

Throughout a deposition taken on Friday, Mr. Dimon repeatedly denied assembly Mr. Epstein, or speaking with him, and likewise stated he had no recollection of being briefed by his high lieutenants on the nation’s largest financial institution on certainly one of its most infamous prospects. A redacted transcript of the deposition was launched on Wednesday and reviewed by The New York Instances.

Although he stated he wished the financial institution had been conscious of Mr. Epstein’s illicit actions, Mr. Dimon stated he didn’t recall studying any stories about Mr. Epstein’s 2008 conviction in Florida on a cost of soliciting prostitution from a teenage lady — an offense that pressured him to register as a intercourse offender in a number of locations in the US. Mr. Dimon stated he had barely heard of Mr. Epstein earlier than his July 2019 arrest on federal intercourse trafficking prices and demise by suicide in a New York jail cell a month later.

“I don’t recall understanding something about Jeffrey Epstein till the tales broke someday in 2019, and I used to be shocked that I didn’t even — had by no means even heard of the man, just about. And the way concerned he was with so many individuals,” Mr. Dimon stated throughout an all-day deposition taken at JPMorgan’s headquarters in Manhattan.

The deposition is likely one of the final to be taken in reference to two lawsuits arising from the Wall Road financial institution’s relationship with Mr. Epstein. A decade after dropping Mr. Epstein as a shopper, the financial institution is now attempting to fend off claims that its high executives both knew about Mr. Epstein’s lengthy historical past of sexually abusing teenage ladies and younger girls, or regarded the opposite approach.

The 2 fits, introduced by legal professionals representing Mr. Epstein’s victims and by the federal government of the U.S. Virgin Islands, declare that JPMorgan ignored a number of warnings that Mr. Epstein was utilizing cash to finance illicit sexual actions at his residences in New York, Florida and the Virgin Islands.

Mr. Dimon’s deposition was made public after the financial institution put out a press release following the deposition that stated Mr. Dimon “doesn’t recall ever discussing his accounts internally, and was not concerned in any choices about his account.”

Attorneys for the victims pressed Mr. Dimon a variety of occasions throughout the deposition concerning the financial institution’s determination to label Mr. Epstein as a “high-risk shopper” round 2011. However Mr. Dimon stated he wasn’t consulted on the matter. He additionally stated he by no means mentioned Mr. Epstein with the previous high banker James E. Staley — who was Mr. Epstein’s major advocate on the financial institution — or Mary Erdoes, who’s now head of JPMorgan’s asset and wealth administration division.

Ms. Erdoes in a deposition in March stated she determined to dismiss Mr. Epstein as a shopper due to considerations about massive money withdrawals from his accounts with the financial institution. She stated Mr. Staley’s departure from the financial institution meant Mr. Epstein had no robust advocate arguing for him to stay a shopper.

Mr. Dimon additionally stated he didn’t recall the financial institution’s normal counsel on the time, Stephen Cutler, ever discussing Mr. Epstein with him.

On reflection, Mr. Dimon stated, he wished he and others had recognized extra about Mr. Epstein’s crimes. He stated that the financial institution’s involvement with the intercourse offender ranks as certainly one of its larger reputational hits however that the financial institution shouldn’t be held chargeable for Mr. Epstein’s sins.

“I feel what occurred to those girls is atrocious,” he stated. “I wouldn’t thoughts personally apologizing to them, not as a result of we dedicated the crime. We didn’t. And never as a result of we consider we’re accountable, however that any potential factor, what little position that we might have eased it or helped catch it faster or one thing like that.”