The World Financial institution’s inner watchdog on Thursday criticized the group’s dealing with and oversight of its funding in a series of Kenyan colleges that had been topic to an inner investigation after allegations that college students had been abused.

The investigation, which began in 2020, has consumed World Financial institution officers and shareholders in current months and led to scrutiny of its funding arm, the Worldwide Finance Company, which invested within the academic undertaking a decade in the past.

International locations that make up the board of the I.F.C. have been debating how one can compensate victims of the abuse. Whereas the scandal predates the tenure of Ajay Banga, the World Financial institution’s new president, it has emerged as one of many first checks of his administration.

Mr. Banga can be answerable for directing any adjustments associated to how the financial institution invests in private-sector tasks. He has already confronted criticism for showing to be dismissive of options that the I.F.C. was interfering within the investigation, and U.S. lawmakers have advised him that the financial institution’s future funding may hinge on his dealing with of the matter.

The watchdog report, revealed by the World Financial institution’s Compliance Advisor Ombudsman, concluded that the I.F.C. “didn’t think about the undertaking’s potential little one sexual abuse dangers or think about the capability of its shopper to fulfill environmental and social necessities in relation to little one sexual abuse dangers and impacts.”

The World Financial institution held a $13 million stake in Bridge Worldwide Academies from 2013 to 2022. It divested from this system after complaints of sexual abuse on the colleges, which led to inner investigations in regards to the episodes and a evaluation of how its funding arm oversees such applications.

The report, referring to Bridge Worldwide Academies, added that the “I.F.C. did not usually monitor or substantively handle project-related little one sexual abuse and gender-based violence dangers and impacts with its shopper.”

It went on to advocate that the victims of the abuse obtain monetary compensation.

Nevertheless, a administration “motion plan” that the board of the I.F.C. had agreed upon didn’t totally heed these suggestions. As an alternative, the plan mentioned that it could “straight fund a remediation program for survivors of kid sexual abuse” for as much as 10 years. The plan would pay an unspecified amount of cash for psychological help and adolescent sexual and reproductive well being companies.

The choice over whether or not to straight compensate the victims was the topic of intense inner debate amongst board members, with some arguing that the financial institution shouldn’t be taking such direct monetary duty for what occurred on the program.

In an electronic mail to the employees of the World Financial institution that was despatched on Wednesday night time, Mr. Banga, who was not on the helm throughout the interval of abuse, acknowledged that errors had been made within the dealing with of this system and the investigation and was contrite.

“I’m sorry for the trauma these youngsters skilled, dedicated to supporting the survivors and decided to make sure we do higher going ahead,” Mr. Banga wrote.

Acknowledging considerations in regards to the integrity of the investigation, Mr. Banga added that he would appoint an out of doors investigator to make sure that the earlier investigation was freed from interference.

“We should always have responded earlier and extra aggressively,” he mentioned. “This can be a troublesome second for our establishment, however it should be a second of introspection.”

Human rights teams and civil society organizations have been essential of the proposed motion plans, arguing that they don’t go far sufficient to compensate victims.

On Thursday, they continued to lament the shortage of direct monetary help within the motion plan, which proposes to pay for counseling companies and well being help for the victims.

“I.F.C.’s motion plan fails to do the one factor that’s required of it: present treatment to the Bridge survivors,” mentioned David Pred, the manager director of the human rights group Inclusive Growth Worldwide.

In current days, U.S. lawmakers have additionally been urging the Treasury Division, which helped steer Mr. Banga’s nomination to steer the financial institution, to press for extra to be accomplished and to reject the motion plan.

“I’m involved that failing to supply direct and significant compensation won’t solely hurt the survivors and their households, however it should additionally hurt the popularity of the I.F.C., which has a essential mission around the globe, and that of the USA as its largest shareholder,” Consultant Maxine Waters, the highest Democrat on the Home Monetary Providers Committee, wrote in a letter to Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen on Wednesday.

The Treasury Division, which had pushed for the victims to be compensated, mentioned in a press release on Thursday that it accepted the findings of the report. Nevertheless, it prompt that the survivors must be consulted because the I.F.C. determines how finest to compensate them.

“We consider I.F.C. ought to hold all treatment choices on the desk whereas the consultations proceed,” the Treasury Division mentioned in a press release.

The assertion added that the division was additionally involved about allegations of interference within the investigation and welcomed an unbiased evaluation of the way it was dealt with.

“We’re deeply troubled by the broader accountability points raised by this case,” it mentioned.