The most recent instance got here on Friday evening when prosecutors complained Bankman-Fried has been in contact with potential witnesses in his legal trial. In a letter to U.S. District Decide Lewis Kaplan, they cited Bankman-Fried’s alleged communication with FTX normal counsel Ryne Miller.

On Jan. 15, the prosecutors mentioned, Bankman-Fried contacted Miller over the encrypted messaging platform Sign, in addition to e-mail, and wrote, “I might actually like to reconnect and see if there’s a approach for us to have a constructive relationship, use one another as assets when doable, or a minimum of vet issues with one another.” 

The prosecutors added that Bankman-Fried had contacted different present and former FTX staff, reflecting what they described as a “historical past of utilizing the applying for obstructive functions,” suggesting that Bankman-Fried is making an attempt to affect potential witness testimony.  

Due to Bankman-Fried’s exercise, prosecutors requested Decide Kaplan for 2 new bail circumstances: that Bankman-Fried not be capable of contact present and former staff of FTX or Alameda, and that he not be allowed to make use of any encrypted or ephemeral name or messaging platforms, equivalent to Sign. Bankman-Fried is at the moment allowed full entry to the web, which is allegedly one of many causes he agreed to be extradited again to the US from the Bahamas.  

The prosecutors argued that the brand new circumstances have been essential to “forestall obstruction of justice.”  

In a letter filed to Decide Kaplan on Saturday morning, Bankman-Fried’s legal professionals pushed again, writing that the federal government was “sandbagging” any efforts for the 2 groups to work collectively on modifying bail circumstances.  

In accordance with Bankman-Fried’s legal professionals, prosecutors had instructed Bankman-Fried’s protection crew on Jan. 19 that they have been conscious he had contacted John Ray, the brand new CEO of FTX, in addition to Miller, which the prosecutors seen as inappropriate. They instructed Bankman-Fried’s legal professionals that they’d search a further bail situation that might forestall Bankman-Fried from contacting potential witnesses with out the presence of legal professionals.  

Bankman-Fried’s legal professionals argued that their consumer had been making an attempt to publicly attain out to Ray to supply assist with the chapter and that he had the identical charitable motives for reaching out to Miller, describing it as an “innocuous try to supply help.”

Even so, they agreed to the proposed bail situation to keep away from litigation.

Now, nonetheless, his legal professionals are arguing that the prosecutors’ up to date restrictions—which would come with contact with all present or former staff, in addition to limiting Bankman-Fried’s use of messaging platforms—are past the preliminary proposed scope.  

“The Authorities apparently, believes {that a} one-sided presentation—spun to place our consumer within the worst doable mild—is the easiest way to get the result it seeks,” Bankman-Fried’s legal professionals wrote, arguing that by submitting the letter at 6:00 pm on a Friday, the protection crew wouldn’t be capable of supply a response to the negotiation.  

Bankman-Fried’s legal professionals proposed a distinct situation, which might prohibit Bankman-Fried from contacting a number of key FTX figures, together with Caroline Ellison, Zixiao “Gary” Wang, Nishad Singh, and “Witness-1,” or Ryne Miller, in addition to “others to be mentioned with the federal government.” In addition they don’t want his entry to messaging platforms to be restricted.

Lastly, they requested Decide Kaplan to take away the bail situation imposed in January that prohibited Bankman-Fried from accessing FTX and Alameda property, arguing that prosecutors had not supplied any proof that Bankman-Fried was behind the transfers from late December.

The most recent battle comes after Assistant U.S. Lawyer Danielle Sassoon accused the FTX founder in early January of transferring Alameda property from a crypto pockets, persuading the decide overseeing the case to limit Bankman-Fried’s entry to firm funds and implying that his phrase shouldn’t be trusted, given the quantity of false data he has tweeted prior to now.  

Bankman-Fried’s legal professionals didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark from Fortune. 

The choice is now within the fingers of Decide Kaplan.  

Discover ways to navigate and strengthen belief in your corporation with The Belief Issue, a weekly publication analyzing what leaders must succeed. Enroll right here.