Authorized Tech Information, Are Authorized Analysis Prices Tempting Attorneys to Flip to ChatGPT?:

Earlier this yr, the authorized neighborhood balked at an error that has since develop into a clarion name for warning when utilizing generative synthetic intelligence instruments. In Might, an legal professional used ChatGPT for authorized analysis and filed a short in federal court docket that was rife with faux case citations the chatbot had fabricated.

The information induced an uproar, resulting in sanctions for the legal professional in query, and pushing some judges to require the disclosure of use of generative AI in court docket filings. Nonetheless, it’s evident that with regards to authorized analysis, attorneys aren’t precisely spoiled for selection.

On one finish exists ChatGPT—unreliable however free, or at very low price—whereas on the opposite finish are established authorized analysis instruments, corresponding to Thomson Reuters’ Westlaw and the LexisNexis suite, that are extra pricey.

Within the center are a number of options, some which are included in state bar charges, and others that could be cheaper than the massive authorized analysis gamers, however include restricted capabilities, and infrequently depend on Westlaw and Lexis to feed their repositories.

On the finish of the day, nevertheless, most of the complete choices include a excessive price ticket, which generally is a hurdle for authorized professionals, a lot in order that some could discover riskier choices.

Some attorneys instructed Legaltech Information that whereas ChatGPT is most positively not the way in which to go with regards to authorized analysis, for attorneys practising in smaller companies with fewer sources, and solo attorneys who are inclined to focus in non-research heavy specialties, the web chatbot could also be tempting to make use of, particularly as prices for extra conventional analysis instruments proceed to develop. …

Sara Perkins Jones, the president of Spark eDiscovery, has skilled the prices as a litigator in Huge Legislation at Ropes & Grey, and a smaller agency Anderson & Kreiger. Now, Jones is a solo practitioner who primarily focuses on e-discovery consulting. …

“Anybody who’s truly accomplished any vital analysis work doesn’t discover [ChatGPT] tempting,” Jones mentioned, primarily as a result of it’s a restricted analysis instrument and Google’s search engine would possibly even be a greater different. …

“There are areas of observe which are very trial-heavy and never very analysis heavy… and the iterative a part of analysis [as an e-discovery attorney] may be very tough to do with an AI instrument like ChatGPT,” Jones added. “However for attorneys who concentrate on [trial-heavy] circumstances, and don’t have as many sources [as Big Law], I may see most of these [AI] instruments seeming like an choice.”

https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2023/07/is-chatgpt-a-viable-research-alternative-to-lexisnexiswestlaw-for-some-lawyers.html