Following up on my earlier put up, The Most-Cited Regulation Schools: Sisk-Leiter (Westlaw) v. Sag (HeinOnline):  Matthew Sag (Emory; Google Scholar), Ahead Trying Tutorial Influence Rankings for U.S. Regulation Faculties, 51 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. ___ (2023):

Though the very idea of regulation faculty rankings is at present underneath fireplace, rankings abolitionism is misplaced. Given the quantity, range, and geographic dispersion of the greater than 190 regulation faculties absolutely accredited by the American Bar Affiliation, rankings are important to allow numerous stakeholders to make comparisons between faculties. Nevertheless, the present rankings panorama is dire. The usNews regulation faculty rankings depend on poorly designed, extremely subjective surveys to gauge “reputational energy,” slightly than seeking to simply out there, goal quotation knowledge that’s extra legitimate and dependable. Would-be usurpers of U.S. Information use higher knowledge, however make different arbitrary decisions that restrict and warp their rankings. One flaw frequent to U.S. Information and those that would displace it’s the fetishization of minor variations in placement that don’t mirror precise variations in substance. This data is worse than trivial: it’s actively deceptive. This Article proposes a brand new set of regulation faculty rankings free from all of those defects.

The Ahead-Trying Tutorial Influence Rankings (“FLAIR rankings”) launched on this Article are primarily based on knowledge that exhibits what number of instances regulation overview articles by every of 5,139 particular person college members at 191 American regulation faculties have been cited by different regulation overview articles within the final 5 years. The FLAIR rankings can be utilized as an goal information to the relative tutorial influence of regulation faculties, or as a element in broader goal rankings. The FLAIR rankings are primarily based on publicly out there, dependable, and goal knowledge obtained from regulation faculty web sites and the analysis platform, HeinOnline. The FLAIR rankings embody all absolutely ABA accredited regulation faculties, in contrast to different rankings of educational affect which might be selective, usually arbitrarily so. Furthermore, the FLAIR rankings are designed to impart significant data by clustering faculties into tiers primarily based on their distance from the imply of all faculties and deemphasizing ordinal rankings. Thus, the FLAIR rankings allow readers to make rational comparisons between regulation faculties, slightly than merely making a hierarchy for hierarchy’s sake.

Matthew Sag (Emory; Google Scholar), Regulation College Tutorial Influence Rankings, With FLAIR:

I’m happy to announce the discharge of the Ahead-Trying Tutorial Influence Rankings (FLAIR) for US regulation faculties for 2023. I started this venture two years in the past due to my intense frustration that my regulation college (Loyola Chicago, on the time) had but once more been not noted of the Sisk Rankings. The venture has advanced and matured since then, and the design of the FLAIR rankings owes an ideal deal to debates that I’ve had with Prof. Gregory Sisk, partly in public, however principally in personal. …

How do the FLAIR rankings evaluate to different regulation faculty rankings?
Amongst their many flaws, the usNews regulation faculty rankings depend on poorly designed, extremely subjective surveys to gauge “reputational energy,” slightly than seeking to simply out there, goal quotation knowledge that’s extra legitimate and dependable. Would-be usurpers of U.S. Information use higher knowledge however make different arbitrary decisions that restrict and warp their rankings. One flaw frequent to U.S. Information and those that would displace it’s the fetishization of minor variations in placement that don’t mirror precise variations in substance. For my part, this data is worse than trivial: it’s actively deceptive.

The FLAIR rankings use goal quotation knowledge that’s extra legitimate and dependable than the U.S. Information surveys, and in contrast to the Sisk rankings, FLAIR provides each ABA accredited regulation faculty an opportunity have the work of its college thought-about. Clearly, it’s a lot fairer to evaluate each faculty slightly than arbitrarily excluding some primarily based on an instinct (a demonstrably defective instinct at that) that exact faculties don’t have any likelihood to rating the highest X%. Nicely, it’s apparent to me no less than. However maybe extra importantly, searching all the info provides us a legitimate context to evaluate particular person knowledge factors. The FLAIR rankings are designed to convey related distinctions with out putting undue emphasis on minor variations in rank which might be substantively unimportant. This goes in opposition to the horserace mentality that drives a lot curiosity in U.S. Information, however I’m not right here to promote something.

What are the related distinctions?
The FLAIR rankings assign regulation colleges to 4 separate tiers primarily based on how their imply and median five-year quotation counts in comparison with the usual deviation of the means and mediums of all colleges. Tier 1 is made up of these colleges which might be multiple commonplace deviation above the imply, Tier 2 is between zero and one commonplace deviations above the imply, Tier 3 ranges from the imply to half a typical deviation under, and Tier 4 contains all the faculties greater than half a typical deviation under the imply. In different phrases, Tier 1 faculties are distinctive, Tier 2 faculties are above common, Tier 3 are under common, and Tier 4 are well-below common.

https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2023/06/forward-looking-academic-impact-rankings-for-all-us-law-schools.html