Article content material

We now have a date. Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland will ship Canada’s federal finances plan on March 28, giving us lower than two weeks to invest about what might — or might not — be included therein, which additionally means time is working out to do any vital planning earlier than any potential tax adjustments.

Article content material

Nobody is aware of with any certainty what will probably be within the upcoming finances, however we are able to glean some perception on its potential themes from the 226-page pre-budget Report of the Standing Committee on Finance issued final week, which contained 230 separate suggestions for tax adjustments and spending.

Article content material

Among the many proposals, the next advice might set the tone: “Undertake a public evaluate to establish federal tax expenditures, tax loopholes and different tax avoidance mechanisms that significantly profit high-income people, rich people and enormous companies and make suggestions to eradicate or restrict them.”

With that ominous theme in thoughts, listed here are some potential tax adjustments that would goal higher-income Canadians, together with some potential planning suggestions.

Article content material

High tax bracket

The highest federal tax charge of 33 per cent at the moment kicks in at an earnings of greater than $235,675 for 2023, which is a 6.3 per cent bump within the threshold over 2022 on account of the excessive inflation we’ve been experiencing over the previous yr. The NDP’s pre-election platform hoped to extend the highest charge by two proportion factors to 35 per cent. If enacted, this might carry the highest mixed marginal tax charge, as soon as provincial tax is factored in, to roughly 56 per cent in British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec and Nova Scotia, and to 57 per cent in Newfoundland and Labrador.

An identical proposal to bump up the highest charge for the very best earnings earners was just lately included in United States President Joe Biden’s finances announcement earlier this month. He referred to as for a prime federal earnings tax charge of 39.6 per cent, up from 37 per cent, for taxpayers incomes greater than US$400,000.

Article content material

Article content material

Surplus strips

The federal government might resolve to close down a well-liked non-public company tax-planning association that some refined taxpayers have been using to distribute company surplus (primarily, retained earnings for tax functions) from their company at capital positive factors charges, relatively than on the larger charges for Canadian dividends, or through the cost of a wage or bonus.

The Canada Income Company has beforehand tried to problem surplus strip transactions, however the courts have usually held that any such planning is suitable, and doesn’t violate the final anti-avoidance rule, for the reason that Earnings Tax Act doesn’t comprise a normal coverage requiring shareholders to take away their surplus through a dividend relatively than a capital achieve.

Article content material

The federal government tried to close down any such planning as a part of its non-public company tax reforms in 2017, however these proposals had been in the end deserted after vital public criticism.

Various minimal tax

Final yr’s federal finances famous that “some high-income Canadians nonetheless pay comparatively little in private earnings tax as a share of their earnings.” To deal with this, the federal government introduced a proper evaluate of the choice minimal tax (AMT), the outcomes of which had been initially supposed to return out in final fall’s financial replace. As an alternative, the federal government acknowledged {that a} “detailed proposal and path for implementation” could be launched within the upcoming finances.

After all, we have already got a federal AMT at a 15-per-cent charge. The major the explanation why some high-income Canadians pay low efficient charges of tax has nothing to do with nefarious tax planning. For essentially the most half, high-income earners are doing nothing greater than claiming registered retirement financial savings plan deductions, charitable donations and dividend tax credit, and incomes half-taxable capital positive factors.

Article content material

South of the border, Biden’s current finances included a proposal to introduce a brand new 25-per-cent minimal tax on people whose web price is greater than US$100 million. This new tax could be completely different, in that it might be imposed on each earnings and unrealized capital positive factors for the wealthiest 0.01 per cent.

Capital positive factors inclusion charge

Lastly, no dialogue of potential finances adjustments could be full with out at the very least relating the capital positive factors inclusion charge. At the moment set at 50 per cent, chances are you’ll recall that the NDP’s platform proposed a hike to 75 per cent.

In preparation for the finances discussions, Jonathan Rhys Kesselman, emeritus professor at Simon Fraser College’s Faculty of Public Coverage, simply launched a paper entitled Pathways to Reform of Capital Good points Taxation in Canada that considers the case for rising taxes on capital positive factors in Canada, and the implications for the upcoming reform of the AMT.

Article content material

Kesselman exhibits there’s a excessive focus of capital positive factors amongst comparatively few taxpayers and at very excessive incomes, and means that concentrating on an elevated capital positive factors inclusion charge, both on massive positive factors above a sure greenback quantity or by filers with very excessive incomes, would sharply cut back the variety of affected taxpayers, “easing each administration and compliance in addition to public acceptance.”

Biden’s finances proposed an identical measure. The U.S. at the moment taxes lengthy‐​time period capital positive factors and dividends at a prime charge of 20 per cent federally, plus web funding earnings tax (NIIT) of three.8 per cent. The U.S. finances proposed taxing capital positive factors at a brand new prime marginal earnings tax charge of 39.6 per cent (plus elevating the NIIT to 5 per cent) for taxpayers with greater than US$1 million of annual earnings.

Article content material

If a change had been introduced to Canada’s capital positive factors inclusion charge, it might seemingly be efficient as of finances day (March 28). This implies buyers who worry a bump within the inclusion charge may think about accelerating any planning, together with a possible rebalancing of their portfolios by taking positive factors now, thereby locking in a 50-per-cent inclusion charge. There are additionally extra refined tax methods that would purchase you a while should you’re not sure what may occur to the inclusion charge on finances day.

Jamie Golombek, CPA, CA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Property Planning with CIBC Personal Wealth in Toronto. Jamie.Golombek@cibc.com.

_____________________________________________________________

When you favored this story, join extra within the FP Investor e-newsletter.

_____________________________________________________________