So why do they think about it “protected” for everybody dwelling there??!

by way of theconservativetreehouse:

I missed this a number of days in the past; nevertheless, given the “official” narrative that East Palestine, Ohio, water and air are protected it appears somewhat contradictory for EPA Administrator Michael Regan to inform CNN’s Erica Hill two weeks later that issues may not be protected for EPA officers.

I imply severely, what the heck is the message right here?  And the state and federal officers surprise why the residents of the realm would have considerations about being instructed every part is protected.  On this soundbite (prompted to the query at 07:39) CNN’s Erica Hill speaks with EPA administrator Michael Regan and asks him if issues are protected.  The hedge and qualifiers are off the charts alarming. WATCH:

.

Yikes.  By no means has “we’re from the federal government, and right here to assist” appeared sketchier.  Even the CNN woman doesn’t appear to be shopping for what EPA Administrator Regan is promoting.

h/t tyson21